Dear Authors,

please submit a revised version of your paper, taking into account all comments made by the reviewers. Given the split decision of the reviewers, your revised paper will then be sent out for a second round of reviews.

Thank you for your collaboration, and best regards
Carlo Bottasso

Dear Authors,

please provide a modified manuscript implementing the technical corrections suggested by one of the reviewers.

Kind regards
Carlo Bottasso

Dear Authors,
I agree with the handling editor and one of the reviewers that this manuscript is sufficiently novel and of high enough scientific quality to be publish with the smaller corrections mentioned by the reviewer and these:
1) In eq 4 use "\sin", not "sin"
2) Go trough references are cited: For example " ((Daynes and Weaver, 2012), (Madsen et al., 2010)) " doesn't look good due to the double parentheses. Use LaTeX's \citep{..., ...} for this and \citet when the reference is used actively in the text. See https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/LaTeX/More_Bibliographies

Kind regards, Jakob Mann