Dear authors,
both me and the reviewers were happy about the modifications you made to the paper.
Prior to publicaton, please refine it once more based on the suggestions of the reviewer (reported below). From my side, I would also suggest you again to synthetize the paper and make it more concise.
Looking forward to seeing your new version of the manuscript,
best regards

°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°°
I suggest to carefully review once more the tense of the verbs throughout the text, as present and past tenses are still mixed. I believe that the paper readability would improve by simply switch all verbs describing the author's activities to present (why are the abstract and the conclusions using both present and past tenses? isn't present ok?), leaving the past tense only to referencing existing works.
Finally some comments about figures and tables (although WES editors will have their own opinions):
Figures 1-2-4: they are to me too small and not easily readable, I'd enlarge them
Table 1: I'd use appropriate u.o.m. (tons, MNm, ...), but it might be a matter of taste
Figures 6-7-9-10-12-13-14: the two plots may align on the same line

Dear authors,
congratulations! Your paper is accepted for publication in WES.
Best regards,

Alessandro Bianchini